Florida ballot · Nov. 3, 2026Checked Oct. 17, 2026

Three amendments on your ballot.
Each needs 60% to pass.

All three were placed on the ballot by the Legislature; no citizen initiative qualified this year. Here is what each would do, the words you will see, the cost, and who is for and against.

Amendment 3’s title as reported after the court-ordered rewrite: Increased Homestead Exemption; Lower Cap on Increases in Non-Homestead Property Assessments. Its certified wording is being confirmed with the Department of State.

Amendment 1 · Article III, Section 19

Budget Stabilization Fund

What it would do

This raises the ceiling on Florida's rainy-day fund (the Budget Stabilization Fund) from 10% to 25% of the prior year's general revenue collections. The 5% minimum stays. Each year the Legislature would have to deposit $750 million, or less if that is all it takes to reach the 25% cap. It may skip the deposit in a year when it draws on the fund for a shortfall or emergency, or when it spends fund money on a 'critical state need.' A separate two-thirds vote can also skip it for a critical need larger than the deposit, but no more than once every five years. Once the balance is above 15%, a two-thirds vote in a standalone bill can withdraw money for nonrecurring critical needs, provided the balance stays at or above 10%.

Takes effect: January 5, 2027, if approved by at least 60% of voters.

What voters will read

“Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to increase the amount of funds that may be retained in the budget stabilization fund from 10% to 25% of general revenue collections, require the legislature to transfer the lesser of $750 million or the amount required to reach 25% of the general revenue collections each year unless certain conditions are met, and allow the legislature to withdraw funds for critical state needs.”

Ballot summary as passed by the Legislature, checked against the enrolled joint resolution · Florida House of Representatives (enrolled HJR 5019, via flsenate.gov), Florida Legislature, June 16, 2025; Florida Department of State, Initiatives/Amendments database (10-108), FL DOS Division of Elections
How it got here

Rep. Lawrence McClure (House sponsor). Senate companion was SJR 1908 by Sen. Ed Hooper, labeled 'Similar'; the Senate laid it on the table and took up HJR 5019 instead.

What it costs

The House Budget Committee’s final analysis says the effect on the state budget is indeterminate but likely insignificant. No state revenue estimate for the measure was found.

  • The fund held $4.44 billion in FY 2024-25, 9.3% of the revenue base; the current 10% limit that year was $4.75 billion (House analysis).
  • Our arithmetic, not an official estimate: on the same base, a 25% limit would be about $11.9 billion, roughly $7.4 billion more than the fund held, or about 10 years of $750 million deposits before revenue growth.
  • The Palm Beach County Democratic Party, which opposes the measure, estimates about $16.4 billion would be set aside over roughly 22 years (as reported by WUSF; its method was not published).
Florida House Budget Committee, Final Bill Analysis h5019z1.BUC, House Budget Committee staff; WUSF (republished by WGCU, WLRN, Jacksonville Today), Douglas Soule, Oct. 15, 2026
For
Against
No position found

Committees:

No committee formed for or against Amendment 1 was found in state records.

Polls: None found. Court challenges: None found.

Amendment 2 · Article VII, Section 3; Article XII

Exemption of Tangible Personal Property on Agricultural Land from Taxation

What it would do

This would remove property tax on farm equipment and other business personal property, such as tractors, harvesters, and tools, when three conditions are met. The property must usually be kept on land classified as agricultural. It must be used to produce agricultural products or for agritourism. And it must be owned by the person who owns or leases that land. The Legislature could set conditions and definitions in general law. Real property (land and buildings) is not affected.

Takes effect: On voter approval; first applies to tax years beginning January 1, 2027.

What voters will read

“Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to exempt tangible personal property habitually located or typically present on land classified as agricultural, used in the production of agricultural products or for agritourism activities, and owned by the landowner or leaseholder of the agricultural land from ad valorem taxation. If approved this amendment would first apply for tax years beginning January 1, 2027.”

Ballot summary as passed by the Legislature, checked against the enrolled joint resolution · Florida House of Representatives (enrolled CS/HJR 1215, via flsenate.gov), Florida Legislature, May 2, 2025; Flagler County Supervisor of Elections, Flagler County SOE
How it got here

House State Affairs Committee and Rep. Danny Alvarez. Co-introducers: Barnaby, Chamberlin, Fabricio, J. López, Maggard, Owen, Salzman, Yarkosky. The identical Senate companion was SJR 318 by Sen. Keith Truenow, which died on the calendar after the House version passed.

What it costs

The Revenue Estimating Conference found no effect on state revenue and a recurring loss to local governments.

  • $31.0 million a year less in local property tax, beginning FY 2027-28 (the conference’s final estimate, cited in the House’s final analysis; an earlier figure was at least $28.7 million).
  • Businesses already receive a $25,000 exemption on tangible personal property (WUSF).
  • House staff cited USDA figures: 784 Florida farms reported $39.9 million in agritourism revenue.
Florida House Ways & Means Committee, Final Bill Analysis h1215z.WMC, House staff, May 22, 2025; Florida House State Affairs Committee, Bill Analysis h1215e.SAC, House staff, April 22, 2025; WUSF (republished by WGCU, WLRN, Jacksonville Today), Douglas Soule, Oct. 15, 2026
For
Against
No position found

Committees:

  • Yes on 2State committee account 93338, chair and treasurer Alex Alvarado
  • Yes on 2 PCState committee account 93337, chair and treasurer Alex Alvarado

State records do not state these committees’ purpose, so their link to Amendment 2 is not confirmed.

Polls: None found. Court challenges: None found.

Amendment 3

The homestead exemption has its own File.

What it does, the state’s estimate for every county and city, the court case over its wording, who is paying for each campaign, where the candidates for governor stand, and a calculator for your own home.

The Amendment 3 File → What would it save you? →
Not on the ballot

No citizen initiative qualified for 2026.

The Department of State said in early February that all 22 active citizen petitions fell short of the signatures required. A 2025 law, HB 1205, tightened the rules for gathering them.

The petition law: HB 1205 (2025) tightened the rules for citizen petitions: residency, citizenship and registration requirements for petition circulators, a 10-day deadline (down from 30) to turn in signed petitions, fines of $50,000 per violation, and felony penalties for filling in missing information. Campaigns and voter groups sued. On April 30, 2026, U.S. District Judge Mark Walker upheld the law, finding some plaintiffs lacked standing and that the Legislature could act against fraud, while observing that the citizen-initiative process now has little room left for anything but the most contested causes. Whether an appeal was filed has not been confirmed.

Corrected Oct. 17, 2026: Amendment 2’s effective date and Byron Donalds’ description were corrected. Details.

How to read this page: ballot summaries are the Legislature’s own words, checked against the enrolled joint resolutions; everything else is in our words. Positions are listed only with a dated source. Positions of governor candidates other than Donalds and Jolly on Amendments 1 and 2 have not yet been checked. Corrections: corrections@signaldata.org.