License-plate readers · Allegheny County

Allegheny County

Using license-plate readers · 3 agencies documented

← Statewide map
Adams CountyAllegheny CountyArmstrong CountyBeaver CountyBedford CountyBerks CountyBlair CountyBradford CountyBucks CountyButler CountyCambria CountyCameron CountyCarbon CountyCentre CountyChester CountyClarion CountyClearfield CountyClinton CountyColumbia CountyCrawford CountyCumberland CountyDauphin CountyDelaware CountyElk CountyErie CountyFayette CountyForest CountyFranklin CountyFulton CountyGreene CountyHuntingdon CountyIndiana CountyJefferson CountyJuniata CountyLackawanna CountyLancaster CountyLawrence CountyLebanon CountyLehigh CountyLuzerne CountyLycoming CountyMcKean CountyMercer CountyMifflin CountyMonroe CountyMontgomery CountyMontour CountyNorthampton CountyNorthumberland CountyPerry CountyPhiladelphia CountyPike CountyPotter CountySchuylkill CountySnyder CountySomerset CountySullivan CountySusquehanna CountyTioga CountyUnion CountyVenango CountyWarren CountyWashington CountyWayne CountyWestmoreland CountyWyoming CountyYork County

Pittsburgh Bureau of Police (Department of Public Safety camera and plate-reader system)

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Vendor not named in source
Cameras
Count not documented
The city's Sept. 2026 surveillance report lists plate readers as part of a citywide camera network but gives no reader count.
Contract
Vendor not named in source: $1,387,081 year (total annual cost) · from Jan. 6, 2016 · approved by City of Pittsburgh (Operating Budget, Capital Budget and grant funding) · The city report gives this as the total annual cost of the whole Public Safety Security Initiative: cameras, automated license plate readers and access control. It is not a figure for plate readers alone. The report lists the vendor as "N/A". (City of Pittsburgh, Department of Innovation & Performance, Sept. 2, 2026)
  1. Sept. 2, 2026 A city surveillance-technology report, ordered by Council Resolution 2026-0287 and dated Sept. 2, lists automated license plate readers in the Department of Public Safety's "Public Safety Security Initiative". The report says the readers help police respond to vehicle theft, missing persons, Amber Alerts, abductions and other crimes. It gives the system's status as active, its coverage as citywide and its effective date as Jan. 6, 2016, and says it is governed by order 69-02 and City Code Chapter 681. Council received and filed the report on Sept. 9, 2026. (City of Pittsburgh, Department of Innovation & Performance, Sept. 2, 2026; Pittsburgh City Council (Legistar), Sept. 9, 2026)
  2. Sept. 23, 2026 PublicSource reported that the city does not contract with Flock. Its plate-reading cameras come from Axis, Hanwha and Bosch, according to Daniel Shak, a manager in the Office of Public Safety Technology. The cameras are run through the Real Time Crime Center, and data is generally kept for 10 days unless it is saved for an investigation. PublicSource also reported that the city has used plate readers since 2006. Shak said: "We have no misuses that are on record." (PublicSource, Sept. 23, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • Camera makers named (Axis, Hanwha, Bosch) are not in the vendor list, so the vendor is recorded as unspecified.
  • The Pittsburgh Parking Authority runs separate parking-enforcement plate readers (Automotus, WiseSight, SenSen), per Axios Pittsburgh on Sept. 17, 2026; that is not a police system.
  • PublicSource says plate readers have been used since 2006; the city report's 2016 date is the effective date of the current camera initiative.

From agency records.

Allegheny County District Attorney's Office

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Vendor not named in source
Cameras
Count not documented
TribLive (April 2026) reported that DA Stephen Zappala has overseen the installation of more than 3,000 plate readers across Allegheny County since the program began in 2016. Earlier counts: "nearly 200 permanently mounted cameras" (WPXI, 2018) and more than 400 readers (DA's office, per TribLive, April 2024).
  1. Nov. 2018 WPXI reported that the DA's office had spent several years expanding a countywide plate-reader network of nearly 200 permanently mounted cameras. (WPXI-TV, Nov. 20, 2018)
  2. Jan. 2019 Patch reported that the Allegheny County DA's Office was paying $40,000 for a plate-reading camera at Routes 19 and 228 and Freedom Road in Cranberry Township, Butler County, as part of a camera network the DA is building in southwestern Pennsylvania. Township supervisors approved the camera placements. (Patch, Jan. 9, 2019)
  3. April 2024 The DA's office told TribLive that more than 400 plate readers had been installed in Allegheny County. (TribLive, April 23, 2024)
  4. April 2026 Tarentum council approved paying about $2,700 a year to VIPR, LLC for plate-recognition technology. The system replaces the borough's PlateSmart system and puts Tarentum on the DA's platform. TribLive reported that readers had been installed that month at both North Allegheny Senior High School intersections on Perry Highway, with McCandless police, and that Glassport police had joined the VIPR program in February 2026. (TribLive, April 24, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • Vendors named in coverage: VIPR, LLC (2026, the platform Tarentum says matches the DA's). Neither is in the vendor list, so the vendor is recorded as unspecified.
  • Several municipal police departments take part in the network: Tarentum pays VIPR a yearly fee, Glassport joined the VIPR program, and McCandless police partnered on readers near North Allegheny High School.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.

Munhall Police Department

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Flock Safety
Cameras
Count not documented
WPXI says the cameras are mounted on poles along several streets but gives no count.
Contract
Flock Safety: · Borough officials described the installation as a trial. Its length and cost were not reported. Council is to decide after the trial whether to keep the system. (WPXI-TV, April 14, 2026)
  1. April 2026 More than 200 residents signed a petition asking Munhall to switch off and take down the Flock cameras installed months earlier as a trial, to hold a public hearing and to tighten local surveillance rules. (WPXI-TV, April 14, 2026; Axios Pittsburgh, Aug. 21, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • We found no report of a council decision after the trial.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.

Statewide

  1. Feb. 2016 PennDOT demonstrated plate-reader equipment for legislators in Harrisburg. Secretary Leslie Richards said one patrol-car unit can check 3,100 plates a day, and PennDOT said it hoped to use savings from ending registration stickers for a grant program to help police buy readers. (CBS Philadelphia, Feb. 11, 2016)
  2. Aug. 13, 2019 State Police officials testified before the House Transportation Committee that they backed HB 317, a proposed plate-reader law, but raised concerns about funding and about local departments' existing equipment. The bill would have set data collection and retention rules, barred use for passive surveillance, kept reader data out of the Right-to-Know Law and created an equipment fund paid for by a traffic-violation surcharge. State Police called the readers a "force multiplier for law enforcement" and said existing systems were "siloed." (Pennsylvania House of Representatives, Aug. 13, 2019)
  3. Nov. 2, 2022 PennDOT issued Strike-off Letter 494-22-09: plate readers may not be attached to PennDOT structures, new structures may not be built for them, they may go on existing non-PennDOT structures with the structure owner's approval, and PennDOT will not fund them because it does not treat them as transportation infrastructure. (Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Nov. 2, 2022)
  4. Sept. 29, 2023 In Commonwealth v. Watkins, a Bucks County case, the state Superior Court held in a published opinion that police use of plate-reader data to find a vehicle on public roads was not a Fourth Amendment search, and upheld denial of suppression. One judge dissented. (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Sept. 29, 2023)
  5. Aug. 2026 In August, several lawmakers circulated plate-reader proposals: Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Franklin) to restrict use to listed purposes such as stolen vehicles, missing persons and warrants; Sen. Lisa Boscola (D-Northampton) to penalize unauthorized personal use; Sen. Dan Laughlin (R-Erie) to bar networked systems that log every passing vehicle; and Rep. Tarik Khan (D-Philadelphia) to let people sue and let the attorney general and district attorneys bring civil actions. Rep. Nathan Davidson (D-Dauphin) had introduced a bill in 2025 to bar sharing reader data to enforce laws restricting health care such as abortion. (Pennsylvania Capital-Star, Aug. 31, 2026; Pennsylvania Capital-Star, Sept. 28, 2026; City & State Pennsylvania, July 24, 2026)
  6. Aug. 2026 At a Franklin County news conference in late August, Gov. Josh Shapiro said "Flock cameras are not a tool that I support" and that he would welcome bipartisan legislation to ban them; his office said in early September that he was open to a ban and working with lawmakers. The governor's office said the State Police and PennDOT do not own Flock cameras and will not allow them on state property. (The Philadelphia Inquirer, Sept. 2, 2026)
  7. Sept. 2026 The Department of General Services said it was removing Flock from the COSTARS cooperative purchasing program, which Flock joined in 2025, and reviewing other plate-reader products sold through it. DGS said one municipality had bought Flock through COSTARS. (Spotlight PA, Sept. 9, 2026)
  8. Sept. 2026 State Police told PhillyVoice they do not own Flock cameras or share data with the company; they did not say whether they use another plate-reader brand. (PhillyVoice, Sept. 21, 2026)
  9. Sept. 1, 2026 Sens. Nick Pisciottano (D-Allegheny) and Patty Kim (D-Dauphin) announced a planned Senate bill, a companion to Rep. Khan's House bill, requiring documented reasons for searches, audit trails and retention standards, with civil penalties and enforcement by the attorney general and district attorneys. (Pennsylvania Senate Democrats, Sept. 1, 2026)
  10. Sept. 24, 2026 Philadelphia City Council unanimously adopted a resolution introduced by Councilmember Rue Landau asking state legislators to ban plate-reader cameras such as Flock or set strong guardrails for them. (City & State Pennsylvania, Sept. 24, 2026; PhillyVoice, Sept. 24, 2026)
  11. Sept. 28, 2026 The House Transportation and Judiciary committees held a joint hearing on plate readers, with testimony from the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association (which favors regulation over a ban), Flock Safety, the ACLU of Pennsylvania, the Institute for Justice, the Women's Law Project and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. (Pennsylvania Capital-Star, Sept. 28, 2026)
  12. Sept. 28, 2026 Coverage of the House hearing noted that plate readers allowed the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission to eliminate toll booths; no details on its retention or sharing were found. (Pennsylvania Capital-Star, Sept. 28, 2026)
  13. Oct. 19, 2026 The House passed HB 2771, sponsored by Rep. Jennifer O'Mara (D-Delaware), 190-13, sending it to the Senate. It would limit plate readers to listed purposes such as felony and homicide warrants and investigations, stolen vehicles and missing persons; bar personal and political use and frontal or occupant imaging; generally require deletion within 72 hours; keep reader data out of Right-to-Know requests; bar transfer of data to a foreign adversary; let people sue and the attorney general bring court actions; require training approved by the State Police and the municipal police training commission; and let municipalities adopt stricter rules. (City & State Pennsylvania, Oct. 19, 2026; The Center Square (via Newsline Local), Oct. 19, 2026; CNHI (New Castle News), Oct. 20, 2026)