License-plate readers · Pinal County

Pinal County

Using license-plate readers · 5 agencies documented

← Statewide map
Apache CountyCochise CountyCoconino CountyGila CountyGraham CountyGreenlee CountyLa Paz CountyMaricopa CountyMohave CountyNavajo CountyPima CountyPinal CountySanta Cruz CountyYavapai CountyYuma County

Queen Creek Police Department

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Flock Safety, Axon
Cameras
62
62 ALPRs: 47 Flock cameras under contract and 15 Axon cameras being tested, per Chief Randy Brice in East Valley Tribune, Sept. 13, 2026.
  1. Sept. 2, 2026 Town Council voted unanimously to adopt ALPR safeguards, including making knowing misuse a misdemeanor, and to keep the cameras with access cut to a few employees. (East Valley Tribune, Sept. 13, 2026; KJZZ, Sept. 17, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • Chief Brice said data is shared only with Arizona law-enforcement agencies, not federal agencies including immigration.
  • Queen Creek also lies partly in Pinal County.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.

Apache Junction Police Department

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Flock Safety
Cameras
25
25 Flock cameras after a June 2023 addition of 10, per Independent Newsmedia (June 24, 2023); no current official count found.
Contract
Flock Safety: $315,500 term · from June 20, 2023 · approved by Apache Junction City Council · Five-year master services and license agreement for 10 more cameras. (Independent Newsmedia (YourValley.net), June 24, 2023)
  1. June 20, 2023 City Council unanimously approved 10 more Flock cameras under a five-year agreement. (Independent Newsmedia (YourValley.net), June 24, 2023)
  2. Aug. 2026 Chief Michael Pooley said the department wants "guardrails" on how the technology is used. (FOX 10 Phoenix, Aug. 24, 2026)
  3. Sept. 9, 2026 Arizona's Family reported the department kept its Flock cameras. (Arizona's Family (KTVK/KPHO), Sept. 9, 2026; KJZZ, Sept. 17, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • KJZZ (Sept. 17, 2026) and Arizona's Family (Sept. 9, 2026) report the department kept its Flock cameras.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.

Casa Grande Police Department

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Flock Safety
  1. July 2026 At a neighboring department's request, Casa Grande police used Flock readers to find a vehicle sought in a homicide investigation. (AZFamily / KOLD, Aug. 13, 2026)
  2. Sept. 8, 2026 Police chief gave the city council an informational update on the city's Flock cameras; no changes were made. Police said officers run weekly audits. (FOX 10 Phoenix, Sept. 8, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • Use event dated only as 'last month' in an Aug. 13, 2026 article; recorded as YYYY-MM.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.

Maricopa Police Department

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Flock Safety
Cameras
45
45 Flock cameras within city limits, up from 32 two years earlier, per InMaricopa (Sept. 30, 2025), citing city planning documents and right-of-way permits.
  1. Sept. 30, 2025 InMaricopa counted 45 Flock cameras in the city; Police Chief Mark Goodman said they are used strictly as an investigative tool. (InMaricopa, Sept. 30, 2025)
Conflicts and open questions
  • No 2026 change in status found; KTAR (Aug. 2026) names Maricopa as one of the two Pinal cities with most of the county's Flock cameras.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.

Pinal County Sheriff's Office

Status
Ended or removed
Vendors
Flock Safety
Cameras
Count not documented
KTAR (Aug. 7, 2026) says about 200 Flock cameras are in Pinal County overall, mostly in Maricopa and Casa Grande; the sheriff's own count is not given.
Contract
Flock Safety: · from 2022 · to Sept. 29, 2026 · approved by Pinal County Board of Supervisors · County right-of-way license for Flock cameras began as a 2022 trial and was extended in 2024; board voted 4-1 to send a non-renewal notice. The sheriff's separate camera leasing contracts were also given termination notices, per the county attorney's office. Cameras were to stop collecting data Sept. 29, 2026. (Queen Creek Independent (YourValley.net), Aug. 13, 2026; Pinal County, Aug. 7, 2026)
  1. Aug. 5, 2026 Sheriff Ross Teeple told the Board of Supervisors his office would not renew its Flock contract, citing Fourth Amendment concerns; the decision applies to unincorporated areas the office patrols. (Pinal County, Aug. 7, 2026; Queen Creek Independent (YourValley.net), Aug. 13, 2026; KTAR, Aug. 7, 2026)
  2. Aug. 12, 2026 Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 to send Flock a notice of non-renewal of the right-of-way agreement for its cameras; Supervisor Stephen Q. Miller voted no. (Queen Creek Independent (YourValley.net), Aug. 13, 2026)
  3. Sept. 23, 2026 Sheriff Teeple testified to a U.S. Senate subcommittee asking for clear statutory limits on automated plate readers. (KJZZ, Sept. 24, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • Aug. 12 vote date derived from 'Wednesday' in an Aug. 13, 2026 article; Aug. 5 announcement date as stated by YourValley and consistent with the county's Aug. 7 news alert.
  • Physical removal of cameras not confirmed.

From agency records.

Statewide

  1. Feb. 2025 DPS's Local Border Support grant program has paid for local plate-reader cameras in Sierra Vista. The council accepted a $115,472.89 DPS grant in late February 2025 that covered installing 16 plate-reader cameras and running them for a year, plus a drone and a police dog. A later DPS grant of $311,574.35, approved on an unstated date, included $107,200 for two more years of Flock plate-reader monitoring. (Sierra Vista Herald (Herald/Review Media), March 4, 2025; City of Sierra Vista, date not shown)
  2. Jan. 2026 Sen. Kevin Payne (R-Peoria) introduced SB 1111 in the 2026 session to set rules for police use of automated license plate readers. As introduced it limited use to criminal investigations and law-enforcement purposes, barred non-law-enforcement uses, made captured plate data exempt from public records requests, and was backed by the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police and the Arizona Police Association. (KJZZ, Jan. 14, 2026; Arizona Mirror, Jan. 14, 2026)
  3. Jan. 2026 Sen. Mark Finchem introduced SB 1138, which would have required plate-reader data to be stored on an agency-controlled server not maintained by a third party, deleted after 90 days unless needed as evidence, exempted from public review, and accessed only with a criminal case number; unauthorized release by a third party would be a class 1 misdemeanor with a fine of at least $500 per item. A Senate fact sheet was prepared Jan. 23, 2026; no committee vote was found. (Arizona State Legislature, Jan. 2026; Arizona State Senate, Jan. 23, 2026)
  4. Feb. 2026 The Arizona Mirror reported that the Arizona Department of Transportation asked U.S. Customs and Border Protection to stop hiding its roadside plate readers in orange traffic cones, and that CBP was moving the cameras into yellow barrels made to look like crash cushions. The same report said Arizona had no law governing how police use plate readers. (Arizona Mirror, with The Border Chronicle, Feb. 19, 2026)
  5. Feb. 10, 2026 The Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology Committee advanced SB 1111, 7-2-1, after adopting a strike-everything amendment from Sen. Finchem that added definitions, permitted uses, training, audit-log and annual-audit requirements, and kept plate data exempt from public records. (Arizona State Senate, Feb. 6, 2026; Arizona Mirror, Feb. 10, 2026; Arizona's Family (republished by KOLD), Sept. 8, 2026)
  6. March 4, 2026 On the Senate floor, senators rejected Sen. Jake Hoffman's amendment that would have limited plate readers to detecting government vehicles on government property, and adopted Sen. Payne's amendment requiring a warrant or a subpoena from a city attorney, county attorney or the attorney general to query plate-reader data (the engrossed text applies this to access more than 48 hours after police are notified of an incident, with listed exceptions). The engrossed bill also made willful misuse of plate-reader data a class 6 felony. The bill received preliminary approval but never got a final third-reading vote, so it died in the Senate. (Arizona Mirror, March 4, 2026; Arizona State Legislature, March 2026; Arizona's Family (republished by KOLD), Sept. 8, 2026)
  7. Aug. 27, 2026 Attorney General Kris Mayes announced a statewide review of Flock Safety and other plate-reader systems: which agencies use them, who can reach the data (including federal and out-of-state agencies) and Fourth Amendment questions, with a report to the Legislature and the Governor's Office before the next session. "We need a statewide approach to this issue," she said. (Arizona's Family, Aug. 27, 2026; KNAU Arizona Public Radio, Aug. 27, 2026)
  8. Aug. 27, 2026 Sen. Jake Hoffman (R) and Sen. Lauren Kuby (D) said they are preparing plate-reader legislation for the 2027 session; Hoffman's office said it is drafting several bills, with ideas including warrant requirements for stored data, limits on access and storage, and a statewide ban or strict limits. (FOX 10 Phoenix, Aug. 27, 2026)

State agencies

Arizona Department of Public Safety

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Flock Safety
Cameras
Count not documented
No DPS camera count found. Sources show DPS searching plate-reader data, not how many readers DPS itself operates.
  1. July 8, 2019 An Arizona Mirror review of records covering Feb. 2018 to March 2019 reported that DPS kept plate-reader data for one year, shared detection data with more than 250 agencies and received it from 185. (Arizona Mirror, July 8, 2019)
  2. Aug. 14, 2026 In a Flock network search audit covering July 14 to Aug. 14, 2026, obtained by Arizona's Family from Avondale police, DPS ran the most searches of any agency listed, more than 8,500. (Arizona's Family, Sept. 2, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • Operates statewide; headquartered in Phoenix.
  • Flock is listed because DPS appears as a searching agency in a Flock network audit; whether DPS owns or leases its own Flock cameras was not established.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.