Archer Datacenters Faribault Campus
Archer Datacenters plans up to 500,000 sq ft of data center buildings on about 84 acres north of Faribault; a 2026 appeals ruling sent the city's environmental review back for more work.
Who is behind it
The record, newest first
The Faribault Daily News reported that the council had approved the delay. (Faribault Daily News, July 17, 2026)
The council moved to give Archer until March 31, 2027 to prepare a supplemental EAW, with formal action set for July 14. (KSTP, July 9, 2026; Faribault Daily News, July 9, 2026; Faribault Daily News, July 11, 2026)
In a nonprecedential opinion, the Court of Appeals held that the negative declaration was not supported by substantial evidence and sent it back to the city. MCEA had challenged the greenhouse-gas, noise, air-quality and cumulative-effects analyses. (KEYC, June 9, 2026; KSTP, July 9, 2026)
MCEA asked the Minnesota Court of Appeals to review the city's decision. (Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, May 15, 2026)
The city of Faribault decided that no EIS was needed for up to 500,000 sq ft of data center buildings on 84.3 acres (a negative declaration on the EAW). (Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, Sept. 2, 2025)
Finance & Commerce reported that Archer Datacenters SPE2 LLC had bought the 87.6-acre site for $4.5 million, with a concept plan of up to 120 MW that it called subject to change. (Great River Energy Economic Development (reprinting Finance & Commerce), Nov. 27, 2024)
Conflicts and open questions
- Acreage: 84.3 (EQB Monitor, KEYC), about 87 (KSTP, Faribault Daily News), 87.6 (sale).
- Utility not confirmed in a source opened.
- Only the headline of the July 17, 2026 Faribault Daily News story could be read; the vote count on the formal resolution was not confirmed.
- The case number and filing month come from MCEA, a party to the case.
The full record
- Status note
- After the Court of Appeals reversed the city's EAW decision in June 2026, the council gave Archer until March 31, 2027 to prepare a supplemental EAW; the project is on hold.
- Power note
- Up to 120 MW in the conceptual plan, described as subject to change (Finance & Commerce, Nov. 2024).
- Evidence
- Primary public records
- Size class
- 50 MW or more (tracker scope)