Data center campus · Southern California Fair and Events Center, Lake Perris, Perris, Riverside County, California

Global Stack proposal, Southern California Fair

Inquiry only as of Oct. 13, 2026

A fair district approved exploring a small emergency-response data center; the mayor said the state-owned fairgrounds are outside the city's jurisdiction as Perris banned data centers.

Cite← California data centers
Alameda CountyAlpine CountyAmador CountyButte CountyCalaveras CountyColusa CountyContra Costa CountyDel Norte CountyEl Dorado CountyFresno CountyGlenn CountyHumboldt CountyImperial CountyInyo CountyKern CountyKings CountyLake CountyLassen CountyLos Angeles CountyMadera CountyMarin CountyMariposa CountyMendocino CountyMerced CountyModoc CountyMono CountyMonterey CountyNapa CountyNevada CountyOrange CountyPlacer CountyPlumas CountyRiverside CountySacramento CountySan Benito CountySan Bernardino CountySan Diego CountySan Francisco CountySan Joaquin CountySan Luis Obispo CountySan Mateo CountySanta Barbara CountySanta Clara CountySanta Cruz CountyShasta CountySierra CountySiskiyou CountySolano CountySonoma CountyStanislaus CountySutter CountyTehama CountyTrinity CountyTulare CountyTuolumne CountyVentura CountyYolo CountyYuba CountyGlobal Stack proposal, Southern California Fair · Inquiry only
PowerNot statedNot reported in the records found

Who is behind it

ProjectGlobal Stack proposal, Southern California Fair
Developer and teamGlobal Stack LLC
End userNot found in the recordsNot yet named in any record or credited report we have found.

The record, newest first

  1. As Perris banned data centers, residents asked the council to seek an end to the fair's agreement; the mayor said the council lacks jurisdiction over state-owned land. (The Riverside Record, Oct. 14, 2026)

  2. The 46th District Agricultural Association board approved exploring the proposal. (KVCR News, Sept. 25, 2026)

  3. The Chronicle named this fairground among those the company had approached, and reported a company presentation calling for 8 to 10 MW per site. (San Francisco Chronicle via Yahoo News, July 8, 2026)

The full record

Status note
A state fair district agreed to explore the idea; officials call it early stage.
Power note
Under 50 MW as pitched: a company presentation called for 8 to 10 MW per site. No figure was reported for this site.
Evidence
News reports; primary records not yet obtained
Size class
Under 50 MW (outside main scope; kept for completeness)
Map position approximate, from the reported address or area. Updated Oct. 17, 2026.