Data center campus · Southeast corner of I-69 and U.S. 50, near Washington, Daviess County, Indiana

Outrigger Industrial Washington data center proposal

Denied as of May 11, 2026

A Columbus, Ohio, developer's 120-acre proposal near Washington ended when the city council unanimously stopped working with it, citing a lack of answers, after a large public turnout.

Cite← Indiana data centers
Adams CountyAllen CountyBartholomew CountyBenton CountyBlackford CountyBoone CountyBrown CountyCarroll CountyCass CountyClark CountyClay CountyClinton CountyCrawford CountyDaviess CountyDearborn CountyDecatur CountyDeKalb CountyDelaware CountyDubois CountyElkhart CountyFayette CountyFloyd CountyFountain CountyFranklin CountyFulton CountyGibson CountyGrant CountyGreene CountyHamilton CountyHancock CountyHarrison CountyHendricks CountyHenry CountyHoward CountyHuntington CountyJackson CountyJasper CountyJay CountyJefferson CountyJennings CountyJohnson CountyKnox CountyKosciusko CountyLaGrange CountyLake CountyLaPorte CountyLawrence CountyMadison CountyMarion CountyMarshall CountyMartin CountyMiami CountyMonroe CountyMontgomery CountyMorgan CountyNewton CountyNoble CountyOhio CountyOrange CountyOwen CountyParke CountyPerry CountyPike CountyPorter CountyPosey CountyPulaski CountyPutnam CountyRandolph CountyRipley CountyRush CountyScott CountyShelby CountySpencer CountySt. Joseph CountyStarke CountySteuben CountySullivan CountySwitzerland CountyTippecanoe CountyTipton CountyUnion CountyVanderburgh CountyVermillion CountyVigo CountyWabash CountyWarren CountyWarrick CountyWashington CountyWayne CountyWells CountyWhite CountyWhitley CountyOutrigger Industrial Washington data center proposal · Denied
PowerNot statedNot reported in the records found
Site120acres

Who is behind it

ProjectOutrigger Industrial Washington data center proposal
Developer and teamOutrigger Industrial
End userNot found in the recordsNot yet named in any record or credited report we have found.

The record, newest first

  1. The council votes unanimously to end dealings with Outrigger and to ask the city attorney to look into a temporary moratorium. (WFIU/WTIU News, May 12, 2026)

  2. About 100 residents attend a council meeting where the data center was not on the agenda and no public comment was taken. (WFIU/WTIU News, April 14, 2026)

  3. Outrigger presents the proposal to the Washington City Council, which asks for water and sewer projections. (WFIU/WTIU News, March 24, 2026; WVUB, undated)

Conflicts and open questions

  • Whether the city adopted a moratorium afterward was not found.
  • The WVUB copy opened shows no date.

The full record

Status note
The Washington City Council voted unanimously to end all dealings with the developer, which needed city water and sewer service and a zoning change.
Power note
Disputed. WFIU reported 250 to 500 MW; WVUB reported about 100 MW to 1 GW.
Evidence
News reports; primary records not yet obtained
Size class
50 MW or more (tracker scope)
Map position approximate, from the reported address or area. Updated Oct. 17, 2026.