SIGNALDATAInsights. For the People.
Preview
The License-Plate Reader File · OklahomaIn reporting · updated Nov. 2, 2026

Who is reading your plate?
County by county.

Oklahoma cities and counties use Flock Safety and other plate readers while lawmakers study what state law allows: a 2016 statute limits data from the state's uninsured-vehicle cameras to insurance enforcement "or as otherwise permitted by law," and on Oct. 1, 2026, a federal judge ruled that a Tulsa County deputy's warrantless search of plate-reader history violated the Fourth Amendment. In 2026 Oklahoma City renewed its Flock contract with new limits, Ardmore sent the question to voters, and Tahlequah and Coweta moved to end their cameras.

License-plate readers in other states →

A county’s color reflects any documented agency in it: the sheriff’s office or a city police department. “Not yet checked” is not the same as “none”.

Using license-plate readers
In use; some cameras may have been switched off or removed.
Removing or limiting cameras
Removing cameras beyond state roads, or limiting use, while some remain.
Use suspended
Cameras switched off or use paused; no contract termination reported.
Program documented, current use unconfirmed
Records or reports show the agency bought or used plate readers, but no source found confirms whether they are still in use.
Ended or removed
Contract terminated, program discontinued, or all cameras removed.

Statewide

  1. 2016 Lawmakers passed SB 359, the measure behind Title 47 section 7-606.1, allowing cameras to find uninsured motorists. The statute bars using plate data collected or kept through these systems for anything other than enforcing the Compulsory Insurance Law "or as otherwise permitted by law," bars selling the data and exempts it from the Open Records Act, except data kept as evidence of a violation. (Justia, 2025; Oklahoma House of Representatives, 2024)
  2. 2016 SB 1056 required a subpoena, court order or search warrant before the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority could share plate-reader data with police, Rep. Tom Gann told News 9. (News 9, July 20, 2026)
  3. Nov. 17, 2017 KGOU and Oklahoma Watch reported that the state had approved a contract with Gatso USA for the District Attorneys Council's Uninsured Vehicle Enforcement Diversion program. It set a $184 fine, with an $80 share per citation going to Gatso at first. The story projected about 26 cameras in the two metro areas in the first year and nearly 40 statewide. (KGOU / Oklahoma Watch, Nov. 17, 2017)
  4. Nov. 1, 2018 The District Attorneys Council says UVED camera units have photographed plates across the state since this date and compared them with the Oklahoma Insurance Verification System. (Oklahoma District Attorneys Council, June 23, 2026)
  5. Aug. 22, 2020 Sensys Gatso announced that it and the District Attorneys Council were ending their UVED partnership after nearly two years. Its president said the state had not prosecuted owners who ignored requests, leaving payment rates too low. The company said it had identified about 22,000 owners as uninsured. (Sensys Gatso, Aug. 22, 2020)
  6. March 14, 2024 SB 1620, which would have allowed plate readers on state highway rights-of-way, failed in the state Senate 13-28. A separate House measure, HB 3570, never reached the floor, News 9 reported. (NonDoc, April 8, 2024; News 9, July 20, 2026)
  7. Sept. 2024 A McClain County judge suppressed plate-reader evidence from a felony traffic stop, finding the use violated state law, according to News On 6 and a statement from Rep. Tom Gann. Only the month was reported. (News On 6, Oct. 2, 2024; Walters Herald, Oct. 3, 2024)
  8. Jan. 1, 2025 KJRH reported that the Oklahoma Department of Transportation had begun telling cities to take plate readers out of state highway rights-of-way. Pryor's police chief said his city's readers sit on city-owned poles and called the matter a "gray area." (KJRH, Jan. 1, 2025)
  9. Feb. 4, 2025 HB 1626, a bill defining terms and authorizing certain uses of plate-reader systems, was introduced. News 9 reported that HB 1626 and SB 857 were never heard in committee. (LegiScan, Feb. 4, 2025; News 9, July 20, 2026)
  10. Aug. 2025 Responding to KFOR, ODOT said it has no plate-reader cameras of its own in highway rights-of-way and neither installs nor enforces with them, and that UVED works with it on where cameras go; the Turnpike Authority said state law authorizes its cameras for toll collection; and the Highway Patrol said it doesn't use these cameras. KFOR's follow-up places its interview with the lawmaker behind the study in August. (KFOR (via Yahoo), Aug. 2025)
  11. Oct. 16, 2025 Rep. Tom Gann led a House interim study on plate readers, telling the panel that statute limits them to checking auto insurance. Presenters suggested consequences for agencies that use the data illegally, KGOU reported. (KGOU, Oct. 20, 2025; Oklahoma House of Representatives, Oct. 16, 2025)
  12. May 4, 2026 Rekor Systems announced a preliminary agreement, with final contract terms still to be negotiated, to stay on as UVED's technology partner under a multi-year deal worth $16.8 million. Rekor says it has worked on the program since 2020. (Rekor Systems, May 4, 2026)
  13. Oct. 1, 2026 U.S. District Judge Sara Hill of the Northern District of Oklahoma suppressed evidence from a traffic stop on two grounds: a Tulsa County deputy prolonged the stop without reasonable suspicion, and his warrantless check of a month of the car's plate-reader history in Flock and VehicleManager was a Fourth Amendment search without probable cause. The order notes that neither the Supreme Court nor the Tenth Circuit has decided the question and that nearly every court to take it up, including other Oklahoma federal courts, has found such use is not a search. (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma (via CourtListener), Oct. 1, 2026)
  14. Oct. 21, 2026 Sen. Mary Boren led a Senate interim study on plate readers at the Capitol. The Village's police chief defended the cameras, and an NSU professor and attorney testified that recent court decisions limit Oklahoma's use of the readers to finding uninsured motorists. Lawmakers could take up the issue when the session begins in February. (News 9, Oct. 14, 2026; News 9, Oct. 21, 2026; KOKH FOX25, Oct. 23, 2026)

State agencies

Oklahoma District Attorneys Council (UVED program)

Status
Using license-plate readers
Vendors
Rekor Systems
Cameras
Count not documented
Statewide insurance-enforcement sensors; neither the council nor Rekor gives a count. KGOU reported a projection of nearly 40 in 2017, before Gatso's contract ended.
Contract
Rekor Systems: $16.8 million term (Rekor Systems, May 4, 2026)
Contract
Sensys Gatso: $80 per citation at first, falling to $74 after two years and $68 after five term · from 2017 · to 2020 (KGOU / Oklahoma Watch, Nov. 17, 2017; Sensys Gatso, Aug. 22, 2020)
Sources
Oklahoma District Attorneys Council, June 23, 2026; Sensys Gatso, Aug. 22, 2020; Oklahoma Senate / District Attorneys Council, Jan. 7, 2026; Rekor Systems, May 4, 2026; KGOU / Oklahoma Watch, Nov. 17, 2017
  1. Nov. 1, 2018 Camera units began photographing plates statewide for comparison with the insurance verification system. (Oklahoma District Attorneys Council, June 23, 2026)
  2. Aug. 22, 2020 Sensys Gatso announced the partnership was ending. (Sensys Gatso, Aug. 22, 2020)
  3. Jan. 7, 2026 A budget presentation said UVED had enrolled more than 140,000 people; the FY 2025 actual was listed as 140,000 against a 120,000 target. (Oklahoma Senate / District Attorneys Council, Jan. 7, 2026)
  4. May 4, 2026 Rekor announced the $16.8 million agreement in principle. (Rekor Systems, May 4, 2026)
Conflicts and open questions
  • Rekor's deal was announced as an agreement in principle; a signed contract was not found. The council's page does not name a vendor and says data is kept by the program only while it serves as evidence of a violation. It does not describe sharing with police. Page last modified June 23, 2026.

From agency records.

Oklahoma Highway Patrol

Status
Checked: no program found
Vendors
Cameras
Count not documented
The patrol told KFOR it doesn't use these cameras.
Sources
KFOR (via Yahoo), Aug. 2025; Oklahoma Senate, Sept. 10, 2024
  1. Aug. 2025 The patrol told KFOR it doesn't use these cameras. (KFOR (via Yahoo), Aug. 2025)
Conflicts and open questions
  • A 2024 Flock presentation to a Senate committee includes a case study in which the patrol located and arrested a kidnapping suspect, told in the vendor's own words. It does not say the patrol has its own Flock contract.

Reported by news outlets; agency records not yet obtained.

Every county

All 77 counties
AdairNot yet checked———
AlfalfaChecked: no program found———
AtokaNot yet checked———
BeaverChecked: no program found———
BeckhamChecked: no program found———
BlaineProgram documented, current use unconfirmed1Flock Safety—
BryanProgram documented, current use unconfirmed1Flock Safety—
CaddoChecked: no program found———
CanadianProgram documented, current use unconfirmed2Flock Safety—
CarterUsing license-plate readers1Flock Safety23
CherokeeEnded or removed1Flock Safety3
ChoctawProgram documented, current use unconfirmed1Flock Safety—
CimarronChecked: no program found———
ClevelandUsing license-plate readers3Flock Safety30
CoalNot yet checked———
ComancheUsing license-plate readers1Flock Safety28
CottonNot yet checked———
CraigNot yet checked———
CreekUsing license-plate readers2Flock Safety6
CusterChecked: no program found———
DelawareChecked: no program found———
DeweyChecked: no program found———
EllisChecked: no program found———
GarfieldChecked: no program found———
GarvinChecked: no program found———
GradyChecked: no program found———
GrantChecked: no program found———
GreerChecked: no program found———
HarmonChecked: no program found———
HarperChecked: no program found———
HaskellNot yet checked———
HughesNot yet checked———
JacksonChecked: no program found———
JeffersonNot yet checked———
JohnstonNot yet checked———
KayChecked: no program found———
KingfisherChecked: no program found———
KiowaChecked: no program found———
LatimerChecked: no program found1——
Le FloreChecked: no program found———
LincolnChecked: no program found———
LoganEnded or removed1Flock Safety12
LoveNot yet checked———
MajorChecked: no program found———
MarshallChecked: no program found———
MayesProgram documented, current use unconfirmed2Flock Safety4
McClainProgram documented, current use unconfirmed2Flock Safety—
McCurtainChecked: no program found———
McIntoshNot yet checked———
MurrayChecked: no program found———
MuskogeeChecked: no program found———
NobleNot yet checked———
NowataNot yet checked———
OkfuskeeNot yet checked———
OklahomaUsing license-plate readers7Flock Safety113
OkmulgeeChecked: no program found———
OsageUsing license-plate readers2Flock Safety8
OttawaChecked: no program found———
PawneeNot yet checked———
PayneChecked: no program found———
PittsburgChecked: no program found———
PontotocChecked: no program found———
PottawatomieChecked: no program found———
PushmatahaNot yet checked———
Roger MillsChecked: no program found———
RogersProgram documented, current use unconfirmed1Flock Safety10
SeminoleChecked: no program found———
SequoyahChecked: no program found———
StephensChecked: no program found———
TexasChecked: no program found———
TillmanNot yet checked———
TulsaUsing license-plate readers5Flock Safety127
WagonerProgram documented, current use unconfirmed3Flock Safety17
WashingtonUsing license-plate readers1Axon, Flock Safety—
WashitaChecked: no program found———
WoodsNot yet checked———
WoodwardChecked: no program found———

How this map is built

We start with each county’s sheriff’s office and its largest city police departments, then work outward. Each agency’s entry says whether it comes from agency records or from news reports, and links every source. Companies are tracked separately, so the map can show one company’s customers or all license-plate readers together.

Have a contract, invoice or records response for an agency here? Send it to tips@signaldata.org.

Sources